Li Weiqiang

Lawyer
 

Phone:8610-68287728
Email:13260129023@163.com

Educational Background:

Master of Laws, China University of Political Science and Law

Work Experience:

Mr Li worked in Beijing Haituo Law Firm from 2016 to 2019

Mr Li Joined Beijing R&G Law Firm in 2019 as a partner

Representing Cases:

Apply to the Second Branch of the Beijing Municipal People’s Procuratorate for civil litigation supervision, and the Beijing Municipal Procuratorate decided to accept it.

Retrieve driver information, vehicle owner information, and insurance information from the Asian Games Village Detachment of the Traffic Police. Independently prepare the indictment and evidence catalog, evidence materials, and appear in court to obtain a winning judgment with the greatest benefit.

Responsible for the jurisdictional objection, drafting of the defense, evidence catalogue and evidence preparation in the case of Li v. Han in the North District of the Xicheng Court in the North District of the Xicheng Court, and forcing the plaintiff to withdraw the lawsuit.

Responsible for the jurisdictional objection, statement of defense, evidence catalogue and evidence compilation in Haidian Court’s case of Company A v. Company B in the tendering and bidding sale contract dispute, appearing in court to cross-examine, and finally rejecting all claims of the plaintiff.

Acting for the plaintiff to apply for government information disclosure, two administrative reconsiderations, and one administrative litigation, the reconsideration agency confirmed that the respondent did not act as illegal. The reconsideration agency revoked the respondent’s reply and ordered the respondent to make a new reply within 60. The court ordered the defendant to revoke and redo.

Acted for more than 40 sales contract disputes, online case filing and complaints forced the case filing tribunal to file a case, preparing a complaint that is not harmful to him, applying for property preservation, handling litigation preservation liability insurance, holding courts, and applying for enforcement. Most of the problems were resolved in the first instance. Two cases of second instance: the first instance won the case, the second instance rejected the opponent's appeal; the first instance lost, the second instance was sent back for a retrial.